Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Jaeckle v. L. Bamberger & Co.

Jaeckle v. L. Bamberger & Co.

184 A. 520, 120 N.J. Eq. 201, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 688
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 24, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 184 A. 520 (Jaeckle v. L. Bamberger & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaeckle v. L. Bamberger & Co., 184 A. 520, 120 N.J. Eq. 201, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 688 (N.J. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the learned vice-chancellor.

The question of the jurisdiction of equity to grant the relief sought by complainants is reserved.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Lloyd, Pebsiue, Raffeety, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

NJ Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc.
365 A.2d 956 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Weston v. NJ State Bd. of Optometrists
108 A.2d 632 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Lipman v. Forman
49 A.2d 236 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Mosig v. Jersey Chiropodists, Inc.
194 A. 248 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A. 520, 120 N.J. Eq. 201, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaeckle-v-l-bamberger-co-nj-1936.