JADALLAH v. State
This text of 177 S.W.3d 866 (JADALLAH v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Shareef Jadallah, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by coercing him into testifying at trial.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 S.W.3d 866, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1705, 2005 WL 3112791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jadallah-v-state-moctapp-2005.