Jacquin v. Syracuse Auto Rental & Taxicab Corp.
This text of 239 A.D. 807 (Jacquin v. Syracuse Auto Rental & Taxicab Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are of the opinion that the judgment appealed from is correct. (Gochee v. Wagner, 232 App. Div. 401, 403; revd. on other grounds, 257 N. Y. 344.) If an appeal had been taken from the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict directed at the trial we would have the power to reverse it and grant the same judgment now here on appeal (Civ. Prac, Act, § 584), both parties having moved for a direction of a verdict. Therefore, we have decided to overlook any irregularity in the practice followed at Special Term — and to reach what we deem to be a correct result by affirming the judgment appealed from. All concur. Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacquin-v-syracuse-auto-rental-taxicab-corp-nyappdiv-1933.