Jacques v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jacques v. Strong

260 A.D. 937, 24 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5540

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 937 (Jacques v. Strong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacques v. Strong, 260 A.D. 937, 24 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action instituted upon a promissory note payable to bearer, of which the plaintiff alleges that she is now the owner, order of the County Court, Suffolk County, denying plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out all the matter contained in defendant’s answer as sham, frivolous and irrelevant, and for other relief, affirmed, with ten dollars [938]*938costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action instituted upon a promissory note payable to bearer, of which the plaintiff alleges that she is now the owner, order of the County Court, Suffolk County, denying plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out all the matter contained in defendant’s answer as sham, frivolous and irrelevant, and for other relief, affirmed, with ten dollars [938]*938costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 937, 24 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacques-v-strong-nyappdiv-1940.