Jacques v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jacques v. Strong

260 A.D. 937, 24 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5540

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 1940·Published

Opinion

In an action instituted upon a promissory note payable to bearer, of which the plaintiff alleges that she is now the owner, order of the County Court, Suffolk County, denying plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out all the matter contained in defendant’s answer as sham, frivolous and irrelevant, and for other relief, affirmed, with ten dollars [938]*938costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action instituted upon a promissory note payable to bearer, of which the plaintiff alleges that she is now the owner, order of the County Court, Suffolk County, denying plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out all the matter contained in defendant’s answer as sham, frivolous and irrelevant, and for other relief, affirmed, with ten dollars [938]*938costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Jacques v. Strong, 260 A.D. 937, 24 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

260 A.D. 937 (Jacques v. Strong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.