Jacques v. Kelly
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6226
AIMEE JOMAUR JACQUES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00493-JLK-MFU)
Submitted: June 25, 2010 Decided: July 8, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aimee Jomaur Jacques, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Aimee Jomaur Jacques seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing his habeas petition without prejudice.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
order Jacques seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Chao v.
Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir. 2005).
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacques v. Kelly (Jacques v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.