Jacques v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jacques v. City of New York

7 A.D.3d 576, 775 N.Y.S.2d 897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 A.D.3d 576 (Jacques v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacques v. City of New York, 7 A.D.3d 576, 775 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated July 16, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel discovery.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

There was no demonstration of unusual or unanticipated circumstances to warrant discovery after the note of issue had been filed (see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; Audiovox Corp. v Benyamini, 265 AD2d 135 [2000]). Therefore, the Supreme Court [577]*577should have denied the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel discovery. Santucci, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated July 16, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel discovery.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

There was no demonstration of unusual or unanticipated circumstances to warrant discovery after the note of issue had been filed (see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; Audiovox Corp. v Benyamini, 265 AD2d 135 [2000]). Therefore, the Supreme Court [577]*577should have denied the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel discovery. Santucci, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.3d 576, 775 N.Y.S.2d 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacques-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack