Jacques v. Albertson's LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided September 14, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-00079·Unknown

Opinion

KIM BERNADETTE JACQUES 993 EQUESTRIAN DRIVE #3304 HENDERSON, NEVADA 89002 970-403-4733 kimbjacques@gmail.com PLAINTIFF IN PROPER PERSON

UNITE STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

KIM BERNADETTE JACQUES

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00079-RFB-BNW -vs-

ALBERETSONS, LLC et al / PLAINTIFF KIM BERNADETTE JACQUES REQUEST OF THE COURT EXTENTION Defendant(s). AND REINFORCEMENT OF PROTECTIVE ORDER EFC No. 06/09 5 MINUTE ORDER IN /2020 3 CHAMBERS of the Honorable Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/9/2020.

PLAINTIFF KIM BERNADETTE JACQUES Request for Reinforcement and Extension of Stipulations Civil protective order Personal Identification Information and Identity

COMES NOW Plaintiff KIM BERNADETTE JACQUES, pro se litigant respectfully request that this Court enter an injunction, pursuant to case Jacques v. Defendants Albertsons LLC et al Breach of Contract and Negligence, IDENTITY THEFT. This is the humblest of pleas, the Plaintiff’s Adult Children are at RISK OF EXPOSURE, EXPLOITATION, AND POTENTIONAL CORPORATE INSURANCE FRAUD all due to this :Subject Incident ALBERTSONS LLC. This pro se litigant is requesting that her identity changed my life> Albertsons LLC has violated the most precious Right of being an

Case 2:20-cv-00079-RFB-BNW Document 137 Filed 09/13/2021 Page 1 of 7

American. RIGHT TO PRIVACY. Born an American with Rights TO LIVE FREELY. The Right for a Court of Law to Protect me and my family from any additional exploitation. QUOTE: “At The FMC Group, we believe relationships matter. Relationships, built on trust and lasting lifetimes, are the foundation of our happiness and drive our success. Our purpose is to help our clients live the life they want and attain true peace of mind.” Robert J. Fink, CPFA, ChFC®, CFP®, Managing Director, Private Wealth Advisor

The Defendants and the Defense Counsel neglected to REDACT any of the Plaintiffs Personal Identification Information. Therefore, the Plaintiff is now requesting that all of her personal identification information be redacted from the Courts Records. IMPORTANT NOTICE OF REDACTION RESPONSIBILITY: All filers must redact: Social Security or taxpayer-identification numbers; dates of birth; names of minor children; financial account numbers; and, in criminal cases, home addresses, in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1. This requirement applies to all documents, including attachments.

REQUEST NO. 1 Please Stop the bleeding of my life into the public eye and lens throughout the Judicial Court System and the Federal Court House. Since the last Order to Stay the Case, the following leaks have occurred from the Court and the Defendants or Defense Counsel. This Plaintiff is in complete fear for her family. 1. Theodore Jeremy St. Arnault is the Plaintiff’s Insurance Agent and Investment Broker. Mr. St. Arnault owns and operates AMERICAN NATIONAL Insurance Henderson, Nevada. (*DISCLOSURE OMMITTED*) used an automated bot process to obtain your driver's license number by entering personal information (such as your name and address) they acquired from unknown sources into the American Family quoting platform. "Recent data security incident of American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. ( American Family). "To the extent you were affected by this incident, unauthorized parties may have obtained your driver's license number."

The Plaintiff is requesting that action be taken as soon as is allowed by the Honorable Judges. Everyday, this pro se litigants’ personal identification information is floating about the Defendants businesses and their corporations. They have full access to my entire life, history, current, past, now I am receiving all the notices to let me know that

my life is no longer my own. This saddens me greatly and the Plaintiff is completely exposed. Please help and stop the bleeding. REQUEST NO.2 The Plaintiff’s Identity has been STOLEN and this pro se litigant has received a DATA BREACH NOTIFICATION from AMERICAN NATIONAL FAMILY INSURANCE. Exhibit #1 See attached Evidence. PROTECT MY PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION.

REQUEST NO 3. The Plaintiff has been contacted on multiple times on her private phone number and personal e-mail address from an unknown and unsolicited self- introduced agent of the Court in the CASE of Jacques v. Albertsons LLC. Please stop the bleeding of my life, this pro se litigant personal and confidential information from leaking throughout the court. My privacy and identity are being decimated in front of my own eyes. Exhibit #2 Attached E-Mail Correspondence from: Case 2:20-cv-00079-RFB-BNW Document 137 Filed 09/13/2021 Page 1 of 7 ! Jacques v. Albertson's LLC Inbox

Alex Wieck Aug 3, 202 tome Hi Kim, You came across my radar via the above matter and | thought it could make sense to reach oul funding products. We offer financing against portfolios of tort claims like this one as well as for mass torts, □□□□□□□ commercial contingency matters, among others — always full non-recourse and typically at mo rates. Let me know if this is something that might be of interest to you now or in the future and I'd be | discuss. Thanks. Best, Alex

Alex Wieck Director of Investments and Partnerships LexShares Direct: (646) 902-5996 Cellular: (516) 220-9844 wieck.alex@lexshares.com

lf you do not want further emails from me, please click here

The information contained in this e-mail and any attached documents are privileged and confidential and for the intended recipient only. This email does solicitation of an offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities to any person in any jurisdiction to whom or in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful. An sufficient for and should not be used as a basis for making any investment decision; nothing in this email constitutes investment advice. Information abot be considered complete and is qualified in the entirety by the full offering documents corresponding to such financing posted on www.LexShares.com. 1 on www.LexShares.com may be sold only to Accredited Investors. To the fullest extent permissible by law, neither LexShares, Inc. nor its executives, of any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or definitiveness of this information, and nothing contained herein : representation as to past or future performance. We are not a registered broker, dealer, investment advisor, investment manager or funding portal and d would require such registrations. Securities offered through WealthForge Securities, LLC, Member FINRA/SIPC. WealthForge and LexShares are not af acknowledge the speculative nature of these investments and accept the high risks associated with investing in legal claims including but not limited to c the prosecution of underlying claims and claimant's inability to assert and collect on their claims. Investment opportunities posted on www.LexShares.co securities that are not publicly traded, are subject to holding period requirements, and are intended for investors who do not need a liquid investment. In of their entire investment without a change to their lifestyle. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communi was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending matter addressed herein. Privileged Information: This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and r privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacques v. Albertson's LLC, (D. Nev. 2021).

Jacques v. Albertson's LLC (Jacques v. Albertson's LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.
222 Cal. App. 3d 1371 (California Court of Appeal, 1990)
Cobb v. Ironwood Country Club
233 Cal. App. 4th 960 (California Court of Appeal, 2015)
Digerati Holdings, LLC v. Young Money Entertainment, LLC
194 Cal. App. 4th 873 (California Court of Appeal, 2011)