Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown

688 A.2d 332, 240 Conn. 903, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 38

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 Conn. 654 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 17, 1997·No. SC 15530·Published

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 124 (AC 14052), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded, under the facts and circumstances of this case, that the municipal exemption contained in General Statutes § 20-428 did not apply to the contracts in issue?”

Joseph C. Morelli, in support of the petition. George M. Purtill, in opposition. Decided January 17, 1997

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 124 (AC 14052), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded, under the facts and circumstances of this case, that the municipal exemption contained in General Statutes § 20-428 did not apply to the contracts in issue?”

Joseph C. Morelli, in support of the petition. George M. Purtill, in opposition. Decided January 17, 1997

Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown, 688 A.2d 332, 240 Conn. 903, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 38 (Colo. 1997).

Pincite

688 A.2d 332 (Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown

679 A.2d 27 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1996)

Opinion

Related