Jacquelyn A. Hinojosa v. Texas Windmill Apartments, LP D/B/A Royal Oaks of Pearland and Newport Asset Management, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 30, 2013·No. 14-13-00163-CV·Published

Opinion

May 30, 2013.

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals JACQUELYN A. HINOJOSA, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00163-CV V.

TEXAS WINDMILL APARTMENTS, LP D/B/A ROYAL OAKS OF PEARLAND and NEWPORT ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellees

Today the Court heard appellant’s agreed motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on February 1, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacquelyn A. Hinojosa v. Texas Windmill Apartments, LP D/B/A Royal Oaks of Pearland and Newport Asset Management, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Jacquelyn A. Hinojosa v. Texas Windmill Apartments, LP D/B/A Royal Oaks of Pearland and Newport Asset Management, Inc. (Jacquelyn A. Hinojosa v. Texas Windmill Apartments, LP D/B/A Royal Oaks of Pearland and Newport Asset Management, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.