Jacqueline v. Harper v. State
This text of Jacqueline v. Harper v. State (Jacqueline v. Harper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-06-0129-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
JANUARY 9, 2007 ______________________________
JACQUELINE V. HARPER, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________
FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2005-409263; HONORABLE BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, JUDGE _______________________________
CONCURRING OPINION
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
I concur in the judgment of the Court. I agree with the majority’s analysis as to
whether or not Officer Hayes had a reasonable basis to suspect that Appellant was or
would soon be engaged in criminal activity. However, I respectfully disagree with the
majority’s conclusion that the Officer’s interaction with Appellant amounted to no more than
an encounter. I am of the opinion that facts and circumstances of this case amounted to
an investigative detention. An investigative detention occurs when a reasonable person would believe he or
she was not free to leave and has yielded to a show of authority or has been physically
forced to yield. California v. Hodari, D., 499 U.S. 621, 627-28, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 1551-52,
113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991). Therefore, an investigative detention may occur when a person
in a parked car complies with a police officer’s order to roll down the window or open the
door. Merideth v. State, 603 S.W.2d 872, 873 (Tex.Crim.App. 1980); Ebarb v. State, 598
S.W.2d 842, 850 (Tex.Crim.App. 1979); State v. Bryant, 161 S.W.3d 758 (Tex.App.–Fort
Worth 2005, no pet.). Under the facts of this case, I am of the opinion that a reasonable
person in Appellant’s position would not have felt free to drive away from Officer Hayes at
any time during the incident. Therefore, I believe that the Officer’s request that Appellant
step out of her vehicle constituted an investigative detention.
Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
Publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jacqueline v. Harper v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacqueline-v-harper-v-state-texapp-2007.