Jacqueline Phillips-Harris v. BMW of North America, LLC

District Court, C.D. California·Decided August 8, 2022·No. 2:20-cv-02466·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-02466-SSS-AGR Document 69 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:976

JUDD A. GILEFSKY, SB# 198694 2 E-Mail: Judd.Gilefsky@lewisbrisbois.com RYAN K. MARDEN, SB# 217709 3 E-Mail: Ryan Marden@lewisbrisbois.com KARYN L. IHARA, SB# 298950 4 E-Mail: Karyn.Ihara@lewisbrisbois.com 633 West 5th Street, Suite 4000 5 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: 213.250.1800 6 Facsimile: 213.250.7900

7 Attorneys for Defendant, BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC 8

11 12 JACQUELINE PHILLIPS-HARRIS, Case No. 2:20-CV-02466-SSS-AGR

13 Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 vs.

15 BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, et al. 16 Trial Date: None Set Defendant. 17

19 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 20 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 21 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 22 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 23 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 24 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 25 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 26 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 27 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in LEWIS 28 Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to BRISBOIS B &I SS MGA ITA HR LLD P

4880-9504-0804.1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:20-cv-02466-SSS-AGR Document 69 Filed 08/08/22 Page 2 of 14 Page ID #:977

1 file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 2 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 3 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 5 This action is likely to involve valuable research, development, 6 commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which 7 special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other 8 than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary 9 materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential 10 information regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential 11 research, development, or commercial information (including information 12 implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise generally 13 unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected 14 from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or 15 common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the 16 prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to 17 adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to 18 ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material 19 in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of 20 the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information 21 is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not 22 be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so 23 designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, 24 non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public 25 record of this case. 26 Designating Party must provide Receiving Party with a Good Cause 27 Statement for each Information or Items it designates as “CONFIDENTIAL.” LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS B &I SS MGA ITA HR LLD P

4880-9504-0804.1 2 ATTORNEYS AT LAW JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:20-cv-02466-SSS-AGR Document 69 Filed 08/08/22 Page 3 of 14 Page ID #:978

2 2.1 Action: This pending action entitled Phillips-Harris v. BMW NA et. al. 3 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 4 designation of information or items under this Order. 5 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 6 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 7 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 8 the Good Cause Statement. 9 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 10 their support staff). 11 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 12 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 13 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 14 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 15 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 16 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 17 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 18 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 19 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 20 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 21 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 22 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 23 counsel. 24 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 25 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 26 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 27 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and LEWIS 28 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm BRISBOIS B &I SS MGA ITA HR LLD P

4880-9504-0804.1 3 ATTORNEYS AT LAW JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:20-cv-02466-SSS-AGR Document 69 Filed 08/08/22 Page 4 of 14 Page ID #:979

1 which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 2 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 3 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 4 support staffs). 5 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 6 Discovery Material in this Action. 7 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 8 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 9 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 10 and their employees and subcontractors. 11 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 12 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 13 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 14 Material from a Producing Party. 15 3. SCOPE 16 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 17 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 18 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 19 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 20 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 21 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 22 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 23 4. DURATION 24 Once a case proceeds to trial, all of the information that was designated as 25 confidential or maintained pursuant to this protective order becomes public and will 26 be presumptively available to all members of the public, including the press, unless 27 compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are LEWIS 28 made to the trial judge in advance of the trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacqueline Phillips-Harris v. BMW of North America, LLC, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Jacqueline Phillips-Harris v. BMW of North America, LLC (Jacqueline Phillips-Harris v. BMW of North America, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.