Jacqueline J. Charpentier, Individually and D/B/A Coastal Bend Siding & Windows v. Metals Usa

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 17, 2012
Docket13-12-00136-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jacqueline J. Charpentier, Individually and D/B/A Coastal Bend Siding & Windows v. Metals Usa (Jacqueline J. Charpentier, Individually and D/B/A Coastal Bend Siding & Windows v. Metals Usa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacqueline J. Charpentier, Individually and D/B/A Coastal Bend Siding & Windows v. Metals Usa, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00136-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

JACQUELINE J. CHARPENTIER, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A COASTAL BEND SIDING & WINDOWS, Appellant,

v.

METALS USA, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jacqueline J. Charpentier, Individually and d/b/a Coastal Bend Siding &

Windows, perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered against them in favor of

appellee, Metals USA. On March 28, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that

the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on January 26, 2012, and that the district clerk, Tiffany Garza, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make

arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified

appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be

done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect

was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would

be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 17th day of May, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jacqueline J. Charpentier, Individually and D/B/A Coastal Bend Siding & Windows v. Metals Usa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacqueline-j-charpentier-individually-and-dba-coas-texapp-2012.