Jacqueline G. v. New York City Housing Authority

191 A.D.2d 405, 595 N.Y.S.2d 203
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jacqueline G. v. New York City Housing Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 181 A.D.2d 644

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about July 12, 1991, which, upon reargument, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of directing plaintiff to submit to an examination pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h within 90 days from the date of entry of this Court’s order and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court erred in not directing plaintiff to submit to a General Municipal Law § 50-h examination, defendant’s right to hold such an examination being "separate and distinct from any rights to discovery under the CPLR” (Alouette Fashions v Consolidated Edison Co., 119 AD2d 481, 485, affd 69 NY2d 787). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacqueline G. v. New York City Housing Authority, 191 A.D.2d 405, 595 N.Y.S.2d 203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

191 A.D.2d 405 (Jacqueline G. v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ALOUETTE FASHIONS, INC. v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
505 N.E.2d 624 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Alouette Fashions, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.
119 A.D.2d 481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)