Jacqueline G. v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jacqueline G. v. New York City Housing Authority

191 A.D.2d 405, 595 N.Y.S.2d 203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 405 (Jacqueline G. v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacqueline G. v. New York City Housing Authority, 191 A.D.2d 405, 595 N.Y.S.2d 203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about July 12, 1991, which, upon reargument, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of directing plaintiff to submit to an examination pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h within 90 days from the date of entry of this Court’s order and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court erred in not directing plaintiff to submit to a General Municipal Law § 50-h examination, defendant’s right to hold such an examination being "separate and distinct from any rights to discovery under the CPLR” (Alouette Fashions v Consolidated Edison Co., 119 AD2d 481, 485, affd 69 NY2d 787). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about July 12, 1991, which, upon reargument, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of directing plaintiff to submit to an examination pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h within 90 days from the date of entry of this Court’s order and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court erred in not directing plaintiff to submit to a General Municipal Law § 50-h examination, defendant’s right to hold such an examination being "separate and distinct from any rights to discovery under the CPLR” (Alouette Fashions v Consolidated Edison Co., 119 AD2d 481, 485, affd 69 NY2d 787). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 405, 595 N.Y.S.2d 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacqueline-g-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack