Jacqueline Bridges v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Jacqueline Bridges v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.

DecidedDecember 21, 2006

Docket02-06-00081-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Jacqueline Bridges v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. (Jacqueline Bridges v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacqueline Bridges v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-05-451-CV

SINGER ASSET FINANCE COMPANY, L.L.C. APPELLANT

V.

SYLVESTER BURNS, JR. APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 141 ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION ^{(footnote: 1)} AND JUDGMENT

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion to Set Aside Trial Court’s Judgment and to Remand,” which states that they have settled their dispute. The motion is GRANTED. We set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995).

Appellant Singer Asset Finance Company, L.L.C. shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 21, 2006

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI