JACQUELINE BOWERS  vs HAROLD N. SMITH

District Court of Appeal of Florida

JACQUELINE BOWERS vs HAROLD N. SMITH

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 7, 2022

Docket22-0730

StatusPublished

This text of JACQUELINE BOWERS vs HAROLD N. SMITH (JACQUELINE BOWERS vs HAROLD N. SMITH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

JACQUELINE BOWERS vs HAROLD N. SMITH, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JACQUELINE BOWERS,

Appellant, Case No. 5D22-730 v. LT Case No. 2014-DR-001089

HAROLD N. SMITH,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed November 7, 2022

Nonfinal Appeal from the Circuit Court for Flagler County, Christopher France, Judge.

William S. Graessle, of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Meaghan K. Marro, of Marro Law, P.A., Plantation, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Former Wife appeals an order rendered February 8, 2022, suspending

her timesharing.1 On appeal, Former Wife argues, inter alia, that this order

is in error because it granted relief not requested by Former Husband, citing

Golden v. Bass, 194 So. 3d 1080, 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). We agree and

therefore reverse this order.

We affirm the order transferring venue without further discussion.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

EVANDER, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

1 This Court has jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii)(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI