Jacqueline A. Bailey v. Texas Workforce Commission

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 28, 2012
Docket07-12-00466-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jacqueline A. Bailey v. Texas Workforce Commission (Jacqueline A. Bailey v. Texas Workforce Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacqueline A. Bailey v. Texas Workforce Commission, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-12-0466-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DECEMBER 28, 2012 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JACQUELINE A. BAILEY,

Appellant v.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION,

Appellee _____________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY;

NO. C-1-CV-11-009239; HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, PRESIDING

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Motion to Dismiss --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant Jacqueline A. Bailey has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal, signed by appellant's attorney, based on the Texas Supreme Court's holding in Prairie View A&M Univ. v. Chatha, 381 S.W.3d 500 (Tex. 2012), that compliance with mandatory statutory requirements for filing a lawsuit against governmental entities is a jurisdictional matter. Dismissal of appellant's appeal will not prevent her from seeking relief to which she is entitled. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss with prejudice pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellants request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prairie View A&M University v. Diljit K. Chatha
381 S.W.3d 500 (Texas Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jacqueline A. Bailey v. Texas Workforce Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacqueline-a-bailey-v-texas-workforce-commission-texapp-2012.