Jacot v. United States
This text of 84 F. 159 (Jacot v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These goods were imported in 1898, and the duties were liquidated and paid. One case of the goods of the same invoice went to a bonded warehouse, and was withdrawn for consumption, under the act of 1894, and the duties on that case were reassessed at a reduced rate, according to the provisions of that act. The duties of the whole invoice were then added anew, but no change was made in any but those upon that case, and the entry was stamped as reliquidated at that date. The importers protest against that as a new assessment and reliquidation of the whole invoice. But nothing whatever was done about the rate or classification of the goods in question, or any but those withdrawn from the bonded warehouse. Neither the adding up of these duties to obtain new totals, nor stamping the invoice as reliquidated, affected them in any way, and there was nothing then in regard to them to protest against. Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. 159, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacot-v-united-states-circtsdny-1897.