Jacoby v. McNamara
This text of 275 A.D.2d 695 (Jacoby v. McNamara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[696]*696No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., concurs in the result solely on the ground that, while there was no violation of its rules, the action of the commission in changing the announced method of rating and grading the papers in the examination in question was, under the circumstances, wholly unwarranted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacoby-v-mcnamara-nyappdiv-1949.