Jacobus v. Huerta

Fourth Circuit

Jacobus v. Huerta

540 F. App'x 208

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 30, 2013

DocketNo. 13-1725

StatusPublished

This text of 540 F. App'x 208 (Jacobus v. Huerta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobus v. Huerta, 540 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hank Jacobus appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation, dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and denying his motions for preliminary injunctions. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (6). We have carefully reviewed the record and Jacobus’ informal brief and find no legal or factual basis to reverse the district court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hank Jacobus appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation, dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and denying his motions for preliminary injunctions. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (6). We have carefully reviewed the record and Jacobus’ informal brief and find no legal or factual basis to reverse the district court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 F. App'x 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobus-v-huerta-ca4-2013.