Jacobus v. Cahill

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Jacobus v. Cahill

94 A. 802, 87 N.J.L. 692, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 273

DecidedJune 14, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A. 802 (Jacobus v. Cahill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobus v. Cahill, 94 A. 802, 87 N.J.L. 692, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 273 (N.J. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision of this case is controlled by that in No. 38 of this term (ante p. 562), a case between the same parties. The cases are alike as to all material facts, excepting that in this case the proceeding under review related to a tract of land purchased Mrs. Cahill which was covered by the comptroller’s certificate No. 7215.

The judgment of the Supreme Court will be reversed and the record remitted to that court in order that a judgment may be there entered setting aside the order and proceedings under review. The appellants are entitled to costs in both courts.

For affirmance—None.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Vredenburgi-i, White, Tert-iune, Williams, JJ. 13. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decision of this case is controlled by that in No. 38 of this term (ante p. 562), a case between the same parties. The cases are alike as to all material facts, excepting that in this case the proceeding under review related to a tract of land purchased Mrs. Cahill which was covered by the comptroller’s certificate No. 7215.

The judgment of the Supreme Court will be reversed and the record remitted to that court in order that a judgment may be there entered setting aside the order and proceedings under review. The appellants are entitled to costs in both courts.

For affirmance—None.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Vredenburgi-i, White, Tert-iune, Williams, JJ. 13. '

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A. 802, 87 N.J.L. 692, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobus-v-cahill-nj-1915.