Jacobus v. American Mineral Water Machine Co.
73 N.Y.S. 289, 67 A.D. 615
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 6, 1901·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Instead of appealing, the plaintiff might have had the disputed questions of fact tried at the special term, the case having been reached on the November calendar. Where, as here, the facts are in dispute, and grave charges of fraud, wrongdoing, and bad faith on the part of the directors are -involved, those questions should not be disposed of on affidavits, when an opportunity has been given to have them determined at the special term after a trial.
The order should be affirmed, with $io costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacobus v. American Mineral Water Machine Co., 73 N.Y.S. 289, 67 A.D. 615 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).
73 N.Y.S. 289 (Jacobus v. American Mineral Water Machine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Loewstein v. American Mineral Water Machine Co.
73 N.Y.S. 1139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)