Jacobson v. Van Rhyn

98 A.D.2d 764, 469 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21092
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 1983·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of [765]*765contract, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), dated June 1, 1983, which denied his application to disqualify defendant Bloom’s counsel. Order affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff has failed to show that if defendant Bloom’s counsel is called as a witness, his testimony will be contrary to his client’s interest (Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 5-102 [B]; People v Paperno, 77 AD2d 137, revd on other grounds 54 NY2d 294; Tucker v Weissman, 89 AD2d 852). O’Connor, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacobson v. Van Rhyn, 98 A.D.2d 764, 469 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

98 A.D.2d 764 (Jacobson v. Van Rhyn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaplan v. Maytex Mills, Inc.
187 A.D.2d 565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Valmar Enterprises v. Rutigliano
134 A.D.2d 250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Abrams v. Kearney
133 Misc. 2d 845 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
In re Hof
102 A.D.2d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)