Jacobson v. Van Rhyn
This text of 98 A.D.2d 764 (Jacobson v. Van Rhyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of [765]*765contract, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), dated June 1, 1983, which denied his application to disqualify defendant Bloom’s counsel. Order affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff has failed to show that if defendant Bloom’s counsel is called as a witness, his testimony will be contrary to his client’s interest (Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 5-102 [B]; People v Paperno, 77 AD2d 137, revd on other grounds 54 NY2d 294; Tucker v Weissman, 89 AD2d 852). O’Connor, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 A.D.2d 764, 469 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobson-v-van-rhyn-nyappdiv-1983.