Jacobson v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Jacobson v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 354

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 5, 1956

DocketNo. 60217; protest 216158-K (B) (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Cust. Ct. 354 (Jacobson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobson v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 354 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items involved do not simulate any natural flower in their physical characteristics and appearances, that they are in chief value of compounds of cellulose, other than cellulose acetate, but not made in chief value of transparent bands, sheets, or strips, and that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that in De Waubert, Inc. and N. M. Albert Co., Inc. (36 Cust. Ct. 12, C. D. 1747), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items involved do not simulate any natural flower in their physical characteristics and appearances, that they are in chief value of compounds of cellulose, other than cellulose acetate, but not made in chief value of transparent bands, sheets, or strips, and that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that in De Waubert, Inc. and N. M. Albert Co., Inc. (36 Cust. Ct. 12, C. D. 1747), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Cust. Ct. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobson-v-united-states-cusc-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack