Jacobson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
This text of 824 F.2d 287 (Jacobson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT
The Supreme Court — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3204, 96 L.Ed.2d 691 having vacated our decision in Jacobson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 797 F.2d 1197 (3d Cir.1986), and remanded the proceeding to us in light of Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987), we in turn now vacate the district court’s decision in Jacobson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 605 F.Supp. 510 (W.D.Pa.1984), and remand the case for further action consistent with the Supreme Court’s mandate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
824 F.2d 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobson-v-merrill-lynch-pierce-fenner-smith-inc-ca3-1987.