Jacobson v. Jacobson
268 A.D. 770, 49 N.Y.S.2d 166
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1944·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
There is here a controversy as to the existence, the content and effect of the oral agreement. Whether the contract, if made, is void and unenforeible under the Statute of Frauds (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 1), can be best determined upon a trial of the issues.
The order and the judgment should be reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied.
Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied. [See post, p. 848.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacobson v. Jacobson, 268 A.D. 770, 49 N.Y.S.2d 166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
268 A.D. 770 (Jacobson v. Jacobson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sutton v. Sandler
36 Misc. 2d 480 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Leibowitz v. Cohen
33 Misc. 2d 138 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Thorp v. Pittsburgh Bicentennial Ass'n
22 Misc. 2d 233 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Lenz v. World-Wide Automobiles Corp.
9 Misc. 2d 32 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Harman v. Spiegel
1 A.D.2d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
In re the Accounting of Kirk
193 Misc. 704 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1948)
Newkirk v. C. C. Bradley & Son, Inc.
271 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
High v. Pritzker
269 A.D. 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Droste v. Harry Atlas Sons, Inc.
147 F.2d 675 (Second Circuit, 1945)