Jacobson v. Doty Plaster Manufacturing Co.

39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 436
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 436 (Jacobson v. Doty Plaster Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobson v. Doty Plaster Manufacturing Co., 39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 436 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Opinion

TEMAN, J:

This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver in proceed-gs supplementary to execution. The odjection is that tbe order ,n only be made in the judicial district where the action was tried hich was the second, and this order was made in the first district. This objection is invalid. The supplementary proceedings in ds case were instituted and concluded before a judge of the Supreme ourt in the first judicial district, and it was proper for him to ipoint the receiver.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Barnard, P. J., and Pratt, J., concurred.

Order appointing receiver affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobson-v-doty-plaster-manufacturing-co-nysupct-1884.