Jacobsen v. Simons

217 Mass. 194
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 217 Mass. 194 (Jacobsen v. Simons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobsen v. Simons, 217 Mass. 194 (Mass. 1914).

Opinion

Sheldon, J.

Upon the evidence the jury could have found that the plaintiff not only was permitted, but was invited, to use the defendant’s toilet room. If so, the defendant owed to her the duty of exercising reasonable care to see that the room and the approaches by which the plaintiff was to get to it were reasonably safe for her use. Toland v. Paine Furniture Co. 179 Mass. 501. It seems also plain that, whatever the weight of the evidence might have been, there was evidence on which it could have been found that the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care, and that she was injured by reason of a failure of the defendant to exercise the care which was incumbent upon her for the purpose of keeping her premises safe for one whom she had invited to use them. Marwedel v. Cook, 154 Mass. 235. Holmes v. Drew, 151 Mass. 578.

It follows that the case should have been submitted to the jury, and there must be a new trials

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Giacomuzzi v. Klein
88 N.E.2d 548 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1949)
Tetrault v. Ghibellini
55 N.E.2d 956 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)
Lerner v. Hayes-Bickford Lunch System, Inc.
51 N.E.2d 774 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
O'Brien v. Harvard Restaurant & Liquor Co.
38 N.E.2d 658 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Callaghan v. R. H. White Co.
22 N.E.2d 10 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
McNamara v. MacLean
302 Mass. 428 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Palmer v. Boston Penny Savings Bank
17 N.E.2d 899 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)
Cobham v. Marvel System Beauty Shop, Inc.
3 Mass. App. Div. 282 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1938)
Robinson v. Weber Duck Inn Co.
1 N.E.2d 27 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Comeau v. Comeau
285 Mass. 578 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Pope v. Willow Garages Inc.
174 N.E. 727 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Serota v. Salmansohn
152 N.E. 242 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
Cullen v. New England Fuel & Transportation Co.
148 N.E. 371 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Jacobsen v. Simons
111 N.E. 46 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 Mass. 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobsen-v-simons-mass-1914.