Jacobsen v. Arnouk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jacobsen v. Arnouk

209 A.D.2d 671, 619 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11750

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 28, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.D.2d 671 (Jacobsen v. Arnouk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobsen v. Arnouk, 209 A.D.2d 671, 619 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the plaintiffs from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), entered July 17, 1992.

[672]*672Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, for reasons stated by Justice Clemente at the Supreme Court in a memorandum decision dated April 23, 1991. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the plaintiffs from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), entered July 17, 1992.

[672]*672Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, for reasons stated by Justice Clemente at the Supreme Court in a memorandum decision dated April 23, 1991. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 671, 619 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobsen-v-arnouk-nyappdiv-1994.