Jacobs v. Wappingers Central School District

266 A.D.2d 215, 697 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11088

This text of 266 A.D.2d 215 (Jacobs v. Wappingers Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. Wappingers Central School District, 266 A.D.2d 215, 697 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11088 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Wappingers Central School District, to file an affidavit stating that the petitioner is eligible for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System, the petitioner ap[216]*216peals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bellantoni, J.), dated August 18, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, the determination is annulled, and the matter is remitted to the respondent to file an affidavit pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 (b) (3) stating that the petitioner is eligible for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System.

Initially, we determine that the verification of the petition in this case was proper. Further, contrary to the Supreme Court’s conclusion, the petitioner satisfied her initial burden of demonstrating that she met the requirements of Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 (b) (3) (see, Matter of Scanlan v Buffalo Pub. School Sys., 90 NY2d 662; Matter of Spector v Board of Educ., 251 AD2d 588). The respondent’s vague and conclusory assertion that it was not the petitioner’s first public employer was insufficient to demonstrate a rational basis for its failure to process the petitioner’s application for retroactive membership in the retirement system. Since the dates of the petitioner’s employment' with the respondent are not disputed, the determination of her date of membership will be made by the public retirement system (see, Retirement and Social Security Law § 803 [b], [c]). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scanlan v. Buffalo Public School System
687 N.E.2d 1334 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Spector v. Board of Education
251 A.D.2d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 215, 697 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-wappingers-central-school-district-nyappdiv-1999.