Jacobs v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Jacobs v. United States

584 F. App'x 70

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2014·No. No. 14-6676·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christina Jacobs appeals the district court’s order accepting, in part, the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the Government’s motion to dismiss her civil action, brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 to 2680 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Jacobs v. United States, No. 5:13-cv-00069-FPS-JES, 2014 WL 1479203 (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christina Jacobs appeals the district court’s order accepting, in part, the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the Government’s motion to dismiss her civil action, brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 to 2680 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Jacobs v. United States, No. 5:13-cv-00069-FPS-JES, 2014 WL 1479203 (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jacobs v. United States, 584 F. App'x 70 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

584 F. App'x 70 (Jacobs v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related