Jacobs v. Tolman

8 Mass. 161
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1811
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 8 Mass. 161 (Jacobs v. Tolman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. Tolman, 8 Mass. 161 (Mass. 1811).

Opinion

By the Court.

From the case stated we take it as agreed that Smith’s house was situate within the boundaries of the jail-yard, as fixed and determined by the Court of Sessions; they had then authority to appropriate the whole house, or any apartments in it, for receiving and lodging prisoners for debt, having the owner’s consent. It appears by the case that this was done here. The Sessions paid rent for the use of it, for the purpose of lodging prisoners for debt; and without a formal lease, the sheriff and his deputy jailer had full authority to enter the apartments so appropriated, in the same manner as they had' to enter the jail itself, and to exercise the same control therein. Their neglecting to exercise such control could not operate to charge a prisoner with an escape, who duly kept within the limits and apartments prescribed. There was then no escape. The verdict must be set aside, and the defendant have judgment for his costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blair v. Ellsworth
55 Vt. 415 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1883)
Paddock v. Kittredge
31 Vt. 378 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1858)
Ives v. Hulet
12 Vt. 314 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1840)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Mass. 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-tolman-mass-1811.