Jacobs v. Tipton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jacobs v. Tipton

829 S.W.2d 94, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 1992 WL 82687

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 1992·No. No. 60964·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment entered against him in a breach of contract and conversion case. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment entered against him in a breach of contract and conversion case. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Jacobs v. Tipton, 829 S.W.2d 94, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 706, 1992 WL 82687 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

829 S.W.2d 94 (Jacobs v. Tipton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.