Jacobs v. State

270 S.W. 1117, 99 Tex. Crim. 541, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 244

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jacobs v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 Tex. Crim. 253 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 15, 1925·No. No. 9372.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Defendant is under conviction for theft of an automobile, punishment is confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Since filing the record in this court defendant has presented his personal request for permission to withdraw it, stating in an affidavit that he desires no longer to prosecute the appeal.

In compliance with such request the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Defendant is under conviction for theft of an automobile, punishment is confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Since filing the record in this court defendant has presented his personal request for permission to withdraw it, stating in an affidavit that he desires no longer to prosecute the appeal.

In compliance with such request the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

Jacobs v. State, 270 S.W. 1117, 99 Tex. Crim. 541, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 244 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

270 S.W. 1117 (Jacobs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.