Jacobs v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jacobs v. State

37 S.E.2d 438, 73 Ga. App. 550, 1946 Ga. App. LEXIS 357

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 14, 1946

Docket30946.

StatusPublished

This text of 37 S.E.2d 438 (Jacobs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobs v. State, 37 S.E.2d 438, 73 Ga. App. 550, 1946 Ga. App. LEXIS 357 (Ga. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

There being a dissent in the division of this court to which this case was originally assigned, the case was considered by the court as a whole, pursuant to the act of the General Assembly approved March 8, 1945 (Ga. L. 1945, p. 232 ). The controlling question in this case was certified by the court, as a whole, to the Supreme Court.

Under the decision of the Supreme Court, rendered January 17, 1946, it was held: “The statute of limitations approved February 9, 1943 (Ga. L. 1943, p. 245), has no application where the disbarment proceedings are based on conviction for crime involving moral turpitude.”

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., Sutton, P. J., MacIntyre, Felton and Parker, JJ., concur. *551 Howard, Camp &aTUler, Harold Karp, for plaintiff in error. E. E. Andrews, solicitor-general, Burwood T. Pye, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

There being a dissent in the division of this court to which this case was originally assigned, the case was considered by the court as a whole, pursuant to the act of the General Assembly approved March 8, 1945 (Ga. L. 1945, p. 232 ). The controlling question in this case was certified by the court, as a whole, to the Supreme Court.

Under the decision of the Supreme Court, rendered January 17, 1946, it was held: “The statute of limitations approved February 9, 1943 (Ga. L. 1943, p. 245), has no application where the disbarment proceedings are based on conviction for crime involving moral turpitude.”

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., Sutton, P. J., MacIntyre, Felton and Parker, JJ., concur. *551 Howard, Camp &aTUler, Harold Karp, for plaintiff in error. E. E. Andrews, solicitor-general, Burwood T. Pye, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 S.E.2d 438, 73 Ga. App. 550, 1946 Ga. App. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-state-gactapp-1946.