Jacobs v. State

139 S.E. 160, 37 Ga. App. 159, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 543
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1927·No. 18264·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence in this case was entirely circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the court erred in overruling the motion for' a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. J. R. Hutcheson, for plaintiff in error, cited: Wilson T. State, 32 Ga. App. 427. S. W. Ragsdale, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacobs v. State, 139 S.E. 160, 37 Ga. App. 159, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 543 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

139 S.E. 160 (Jacobs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
123 S.E. 623 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)