Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Jacobs v. State

Jacobs v. State

139 S.E. 160, 37 Ga. App. 159, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 543
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 26, 1927
Docket18264
StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 160 (Jacobs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. State, 139 S.E. 160, 37 Ga. App. 159, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 543 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence in this case was entirely circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the court erred in overruling the motion for' a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. ■ J. R. Hutcheson, for plaintiff in error, cited: Wilson T. State, 32 Ga. App. 427. S. W. Ragsdale, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. State
123 S.E. 623 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 160, 37 Ga. App. 159, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-state-gactapp-1927.