Jacobs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jacobs v. State

399 So. 2d 97, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19978

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 28, 1981

DocketNo. XX-97

StatusPublished

This text of 399 So. 2d 97 (Jacobs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobs v. State, 399 So. 2d 97, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19978 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On February 22, 1980, Jacobs pled guilty to a charge of armed robbery. The trial court then sentenced him to 99 years imprisonment reserving jurisdiction to review any Parole and Probation Commission release order pursuant to Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). Jacobs then moved to correct the sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Jacobs challenged the constitutionality of Section 947.16(3). The trial court denied the motion and Jacobs filed this appeal. The issues Jacobs raises on appeal have been recently addressed and resolved by this court in Arnett v. State, 397 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA). Since we find no basis upon which to distinguish this cause from Arnett, the order denying Jacobs’ motion is

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Chief Judge, and LARRY G. SMITH and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On February 22, 1980, Jacobs pled guilty to a charge of armed robbery. The trial court then sentenced him to 99 years imprisonment reserving jurisdiction to review any Parole and Probation Commission release order pursuant to Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). Jacobs then moved to correct the sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Jacobs challenged the constitutionality of Section 947.16(3). The trial court denied the motion and Jacobs filed this appeal. The issues Jacobs raises on appeal have been recently addressed and resolved by this court in Arnett v. State, 397 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA). Since we find no basis upon which to distinguish this cause from Arnett, the order denying Jacobs’ motion is

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Chief Judge, and LARRY G. SMITH and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

399 So. 2d 97, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack