Jacobs v. State

325 So. 2d 425, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19123
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jacobs v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 327 So. 2d 896
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 23, 1975·No. No. V-402·Published

Opinions

SMITH, Judge.

This is another case in which both the prosecutor and defense counsel announced acceptance of the prospective jurors, who were excused and reassembled three days later to be sworn and to hear the case. Defense counsel, for a plausibly stated reason, then sought to exercise peremptory challenges which the trial court refused to honor. In two decisions rendered since the trial and conviction in this case, this Court has determined, on review of prior decisions of the Supreme Court, that the trial court’s action was reversible error requiring a new trial. Shelby v. State, 301 So.2d 461 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974); Walden v. State, 319 So.2d 51 (Fla.App. 1st, 1975).

Reversed.

MILLS, J., concurs. BOYER, C. J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacobs v. State, 325 So. 2d 425, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19123 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

325 So. 2d 425 (Jacobs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walden v. State
319 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Shelby v. State
301 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)