Jacobs v. State
149 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 645
This text of 149 So. 926 (Jacobs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jacobs v. State, 149 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 645 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law. The cause was tried without error. The testimony, which was in conflict, made a ease for the jury. There is no reason to disturb the finding, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
149 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-state-alactapp-1933.