Jacobs v. State
149 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 645
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jacobs v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 195 →
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law. The cause was tried without error. The testimony, which was in conflict, made a ease for the jury. There is no reason to disturb the finding, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacobs v. State, 149 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 645 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).
149 So. 926 (Jacobs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.