Jacobs v. St. Joseph Milling Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Jacobs v. St. Joseph Milling Co.

67 N.W. 884, 48 Neb. 898, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 168

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedJune 16, 1896

DocketNo. 6618

StatusPublished

This text of 67 N.W. 884 (Jacobs v. St. Joseph Milling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobs v. St. Joseph Milling Co., 67 N.W. 884, 48 Neb. 898, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 168 (Neb. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Ragan, C.

This is an action in replevin brought to the district court of Douglas county by the St. Joseph Milling Company against W. K. Jacobs and others. The milling-company had a verdict and judgment, and Jacobs and others prosecute here a petition in error.

The record presents not a single legitimately debatable question of law or fact. It is argued here that the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence, but there is not the slightest ground for this contention. It is also said that the district court erred in giving a couple of instructions, but the arguments urged against these instructions are mere criticisms of the most technical character. There is no error whatever in the record and the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ragan, C.

This is an action in replevin brought to the district court of Douglas county by the St. Joseph Milling Company against W. K. Jacobs and others. The milling-company had a verdict and judgment, and Jacobs and others prosecute here a petition in error.

The record presents not a single legitimately debatable question of law or fact. It is argued here that the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence, but there is not the slightest ground for this contention. It is also said that the district court erred in giving a couple of instructions, but the arguments urged against these instructions are mere criticisms of the most technical character. There is no error whatever in the record and the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 N.W. 884, 48 Neb. 898, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-st-joseph-milling-co-neb-1896.