Jacobs v. Spofford
This text of 34 Tex. 152 (Jacobs v. Spofford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The error assigned in this case is that the note sued on was stamped with proprietary stamps; and it is said it might as well have been stamped with postage stamps; we say it might as well not have been stamped at all.
The maker of the note showed a disposition to avoid any fraud against the United States.
We are not told what kind of proprietary stamps were used; but we are left to infer that they are those usuably placed on lucifer match and cigar boxes; this was probably a wrong use of the stamps. The courts of this State will admit a promissory note in evidence, if not stamped at all. The United States must collect her revenue, without assuming to regulate the law of evidence- in the different States.
We are of opinion that delay is properly suggested.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Tex. 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-spofford-tex-1871.