Jacobs v. S & H Grossinger, Inc.

21 Misc. 2d 261, 193 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2591
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 1959
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Misc. 2d 261 (Jacobs v. S & H Grossinger, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. S & H Grossinger, Inc., 21 Misc. 2d 261, 193 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The attorney’s excuse that because of the illness of his daughter it became necessary for him and his wife to carry on the responsibility of the home and two children, and for that reason he was unable to actively engage in his practice until December, 1958, is not a valid one, in view of the lapse of 32 months between joinder of issue and defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Misc. 2d 261, 193 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-s-h-grossinger-inc-nyappterm-1959.