Jacobs v. Morrison

Superior Court of New York

Jacobs v. Morrison

19 N.Y.S. 1021

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedJuly 5, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 19 N.Y.S. 1021 (Jacobs v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobs v. Morrison, 19 N.Y.S. 1021 (superctny 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Freedman, J.

The record submitted does not contain the evidence given upon the trial of the issues, and consequently it must be assumed that the findings of fact which were made were supported by sufficient evidence. That being so, the only substantial question presented by the appeal is whether the facts, as found, justify the conclusion of law based thereon, and the judgment as finally entered. Upon due examination I have satisfied myself that the conclusions of law are fully warranted by the facts as found, and that the judgment as entered is correct.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman, J.

The record submitted does not contain the evidence given upon the trial of the issues, and consequently it must be assumed that the findings of fact which were made were supported by sufficient evidence. That being so, the only substantial question presented by the appeal is whether the facts, as found, justify the conclusion of law based thereon, and the judgment as finally entered. Upon due examination I have satisfied myself that the conclusions of law are fully warranted by the facts as found, and that the judgment as entered is correct.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 N.Y.S. 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-morrison-superctny-1892.