Jacobs v. Milmar Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jacobs v. Milmar Realty Corp.

120 A.D.2d 708, 502 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56830

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.2d 708 (Jacobs v. Milmar Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobs v. Milmar Realty Corp., 120 A.D.2d 708, 502 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 5 to determine a claim of title to certain property based on adverse possession, the defendant appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buschmann, J.), dated May 1, 1984, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, entered September 1, 1984, both of which, after a nonjury trial, declared the plaintiffs the owners of the property.

Appeal from the judgment dated May 1, 1984, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That judgment was superseded by the amended judgment entered September 1, 1984.

Amended judgment entered September 1, 1984, affirmed, without cost or disbursements, for reasons stated by [709]*709Justice Buschmann at Trial Term. Gibbons, J. P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 5 to determine a claim of title to certain property based on adverse possession, the defendant appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buschmann, J.), dated May 1, 1984, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, entered September 1, 1984, both of which, after a nonjury trial, declared the plaintiffs the owners of the property.

Appeal from the judgment dated May 1, 1984, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That judgment was superseded by the amended judgment entered September 1, 1984.

Amended judgment entered September 1, 1984, affirmed, without cost or disbursements, for reasons stated by [709]*709Justice Buschmann at Trial Term. Gibbons, J. P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 708, 502 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-milmar-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1986.