Jacobs v. Jacobs

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jacobs v. Jacobs

242 S.W.3d 780, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 75, 2008 WL 169652

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 2008·No. WD 67851·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Margery A. Jacobs (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment declaring that her daughter with John E. Jacobs (“Father”) is emancipated and granting Father’s motion to modify child support. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Margery A. Jacobs (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment declaring that her daughter with John E. Jacobs (“Father”) is emancipated and granting Father’s motion to modify child support. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Jacobs v. Jacobs, 242 S.W.3d 780, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 75, 2008 WL 169652 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

242 S.W.3d 780 (Jacobs v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.