Jacobs v. Howard Insurance

Superior Court of New York

Jacobs v. Howard Insurance

26 N.Y.S. 1133

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedDecember 29, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 1133 (Jacobs v. Howard Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobs v. Howard Insurance, 26 N.Y.S. 1133 (superctny 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The case seems to have been carefully tried and considered by the learned referee, and the judgment directed by him must, for the reasons assigned in his opinion, be affirmed, with costs. The allowance-granted by the special term judge was within the statutory limit, so that there was no abuse of power; neither was there any abuse of discretion;, hence the order must likewise be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The case seems to have been carefully tried and considered by the learned referee, and the judgment directed by him must, for the reasons assigned in his opinion, be affirmed, with costs. The allowance-granted by the special term judge was within the statutory limit, so that there was no abuse of power; neither was there any abuse of discretion;, hence the order must likewise be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-howard-insurance-superctny-1893.