Jacobs v. Howard Insurance
56 N.Y. St. Rep. 894
Opinion
The case seems to have been carefully tried and considered by the learned referee, and the judgment directed by him must, for the reasons assigned in his opinion, be affirmed, with costs. The allowance granted by the special term judge was within the statutory limit, so that there was no abuse of power ; neither was there any abuse of discretion ; hence the order must likewise be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacobs v. Howard Insurance, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 894 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
56 N.Y. St. Rep. 894 (Jacobs v. Howard Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.