Jacobs v. Holman

99 A.D.3d 970, 952 N.Y.2d 456

This text of 99 A.D.3d 970 (Jacobs v. Holman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. Holman, 99 A.D.3d 970, 952 N.Y.2d 456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendants Bay Shore Classroom Teachers Association, Inc., Darlene Dartch, Nancy Kavanaugh, New York State United Teachers, and Tammy Mays (hereinafter collectively the moving defendants) pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them since “[t]he complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action to recover damages for breach of a duty of fair representation” (Portlette v Toussaint, 31 AD3d 730, 730-731 [2006]).

In light of our determination, we need not address the moving defendants’ remaining contentions. Skelos, J.P, Balkin, Leventhal and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Portlette v. Toussaint
31 A.D.3d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 970, 952 N.Y.2d 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-holman-nyappdiv-2012.