Jacobs v. Hevener

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Jacobs v. Hevener

740 A.2d 1137

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 4, 1999·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4th day of June 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the question of whether the trial court properly allowed, over objection, respondent’s counsel to make a “missing witness argument” during his closing argument. The order of the Superior Court is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s decision in Bennett v. Sakel, 555 Pa. 560, 725 A.2d 1195 (1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4th day of June 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the question of whether the trial court properly allowed, over objection, respondent’s counsel to make a “missing witness argument” during his closing argument. The order of the Superior Court is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s decision in Bennett v. Sakel, 555 Pa. 560, 725 A.2d 1195 (1999).

Jacobs v. Hevener, 740 A.2d 1137 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

740 A.2d 1137 (Jacobs v. Hevener) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related