Jacobs v. Herlands
259 A.D. 823, 19 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6866
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 1940·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Order striking out certain complete separate defenses in an action for libel, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Jacobs v. Herlands, 257 App. Div. 1050; Bingham v. Gaynor, 203 N. Y. 27; Moore v. M. N. Bank, 123 id. 420; Nunnally v. Press Publishing Co., 110 App. Div. 10.) The appellant may serve a third amended answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacobs v. Herlands, 259 A.D. 823, 19 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
259 A.D. 823 (Jacobs v. Herlands) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stanwick v. A.R.A. Services, Inc.
88 A.D.2d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Mink Hollow Development Corp. v. State
87 Misc. 2d 61 (New York State Court of Claims, 1976)
In re the Arbitration between Board of Education & Buffalo Council of Supervisors & Administrators
52 A.D.2d 220 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Lombardo v. Stoke
222 N.E.2d 721 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
Sciandra v. Lynett
187 A.2d 586 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Bridgwood v. Newspaper PM Inc.
194 Misc. 750 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)