Jacobs v. Harmeling
180 Misc. 1070, 47 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2844
This text of 180 Misc. 1070 (Jacobs v. Harmeling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jacobs v. Harmeling, 180 Misc. 1070, 47 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
Opinion
Plaintiffs were not entitled to recover on the second cause of action.
Judgment reversed, judgment directed in favor of plaintiff Jules Jacobs on the first cause of action, and case remitted to the court below for the assessment of damages.
Schmuck, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 1070, 47 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-harmeling-nyappterm-1943.